Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
bafouuParticipant
I got the time to try a new thing. I hope it will work this time
The explanations of the picture :
What I want to say is that 1st option is without the red crossovers, each train stays on its own track (green arrows) whereas in the 2nd scenario, the crossovers enables a normal circulation, with trains leaving A on one track and entering it on the other. That is real life.
Is it clearer ?
bafouuParticipantSorry, I can’t display any picture on the site, it has to have a URL adress…
Just imagine 3 towns at the 3 edges of a Y with the longest branch of the Y being double track and the others only one track.
- This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by bafouu.
bafouuParticipantWell, please excuse my poor drawing skills.
What I want to say is that 1st option is without the red crossovers, each train stays on its own track (green arrows) whereas in the 2nd scenario, the crossovers enables a normal circulation, with trains leaving A on one track and entering it on the other. That is real life.
Is it clearer ?
bafouuParticipantThanks for the answers ! It seems that the passengers behaviour will be quite realistic.
Concerning leisure, will it be materialized by facilities on the map such as stadiums, luna parks, museums or shops ? Will cities be more attractive than others ?
bafouuParticipant+1 to be able to improve stations and add platforms to it.
Underground stations seem to be a very important point also. History is that railroads began with stations at the edge of city, then the city grew and surrounded the station and underground stations had to be built to continue to join the city center. Without it we should destroy a lot of buildings to let the railroads pass in the city, and that is not cool…
-
AuthorPosts