matrix

Home Forums Behind the scenes #4 – Sales, distribution, piracy and marketing

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A question on goods #11041
    matrix
    Participant

    from my experience anything with train->truck combination is in general a bad idea. mostly because trains start to be profitable delivering ~50 items, and truck station capacity is ~18, so many goods/materials end up lost.

    Person012345, did you manage to make this combo profitable?

    in reply to: A question on goods #11036
    matrix
    Participant

    It is all possible, if you are within 20 minutes limit.

    You can extend your line to go to one more cargo station and some of goods will just stay on the train until getting there. Just keep in mind that the goods have to “walk” to industries after that and that time is also counted towards 20 minutes limit.

    in reply to: Passenger unloading #10595
    matrix
    Participant

    as far as I know real life, pessengers unload first :)where have you seen the opposite?

    in reply to: Passenger vehicles really sync? #10109
    matrix
    Participant

    yeah, this is one of the biggest problems for me in the game. and it should work for cargo as well, I think. otherwise you either lose cargo because of station capacity limit (not waiting for full load), or frequency declines and production goes down.

    in reply to: Old locos in modern era? #9913
    matrix
    Participant

    search for “timeless mod”

    in reply to: Billion dollar bug #9719
    matrix
    Participant
    in reply to: I need help with a simple station and its signals – #8210
    matrix
    Participant

    The well and refinery won’t produce more than amount of goods the town can accept. My guess is that one of your lines can transfer more than that, and it is faster, so all the oil goes to it.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by matrix.
    in reply to: ZigZag line #7300
    matrix
    Participant

    I believe this can be achieved now by putting a station at each point the train needs to reverse and adding all those stations to the line.

    in reply to: Passengers Missing! #7292
    matrix
    Participant
    in reply to: Train economics #7259
    matrix
    Participant

    I beleive this can all be explained. I will post my thoughts:

    1) The new train line is more frequent that old bus line (1.5x), so it is not “4-5 pessengers compared to old 15”, but more like 6-8 compared to old 15 (that is pessengers transfered per same time interval). But still that is less than before.

    2) You added nice bus lines to your cities. This means that people from your city centre can now get to much more places than before! And their demand for job, leisure and shopping can probably  be satisfied within their own city, and much faster than going to another city. So they might switch and don’t need to go so far.

    My bet is that you just need to let your cities grow a little, and gradually your train line should become much more used. You adding all those lines will definitely help cities grow, as now one can get to a lot more work, leisure and shopping places from many houses. Though you removing the road might have a negative effect on growth, for the same reason.

    From my short experience, relatively small cities can be almost self-sufficient (people don’t need to go to other cities for their needs), but when you create more opportunities to go somewhere, cities start to grow and gradually people start taking those opportunities. You just have to wait.

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)